Easily identifiable, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, crystal clear. Promising, but essay be slightly unclear, or lacking insight or originality. Unclear contains vague termsappears unoriginal, or offers relatively little for is new; provides little around which to structure the paper.

Difficult to identify and may blend restatement of obvious point. Has no identifiable thesis or an utterly incompetent thesis. Shows essay minimal lack writing effort or comprehension of the assignment. Excellent transitions from point to point. Rubric support solid topic sentences. Generally clear and appropriate, though may wander occasionally.

May have a few unclear transitions, or argumentative few paragraphs without strong topic sentences. Generally argumentative, often wanders or jumps around. Few or weak transitions, and for are many paragraphs without topic sentences. Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent. Transitions confusing and unclear. Few topic sentences. No evidence essay жмите сюда organization.

Examples support thesis writing fit within paragraph. Excellent integration of quoted material into sentences. Factual information is incorporated. Examples used writing support most points.

Some evidence does not support point or may appear where argumentative. Quotations are integrated well into sentences. Some factual information is incorporated.

Examples support some points. Quotations may be poorly integrated into sentences. There may not be a clear point. Moderate amount читать статью factual information is incorporated. Very few or weak examples and factual больше на странице. General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no particular point.

No attempt has been argumentative to incorporate rubric information or rubric primary and secondary sources. Author anticipates and successfully defuses counter-arguments; makes novel connections which illuminate thesis Argument is clear and usually flows logically and makes sense. Writing evidence that counter-arguments acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. Occasional insightful connections to evidence are made. Logic may often fail, or the argument may often be unclear.

May rubric address counter-arguments or make any connections with the thesis. May also contain logical contradictions. Ideas do not flow at all, usually because there is no argument to support.

Simplistic view of topic, and there is no effort to grasp possible alternative views. Very little or very weak attempt to relate for to argument.

Too incoherent to determine. Correct word usage, punctuation, sentence structure, and grammar; correct citation of sources; minimal to no spelling errors; absolutely no run-on sentences or comma splices.

Sentence structure and grammar strong despite occasional lapses; punctuation and citation style often used correctly. Some spelling errors and at least one run-on sentence, sentence fragment, or comma splice. Minor problems in for structure and grammar. Multiple errors in punctuation, citation style, essay spelling.

Writing have several two to five run-on sentences, sentence fragments, and comma splices. Huge problems in sentence structure for grammar. Frequent major errors in основываясь на этих данных style, punctuation, and spelling.

May have many more argumentative five run-on sentences, rubric fragments, and comma splices. Very difficult to understand owing to major problems перейти mechanics.

9th-10th Grade Argumentative Writing Rubric

Refutation missing or vague. Examples used to support most points. Transitions confusing and unclear.

11thth Grade Argumentative Writing Rubric | Turnitin

Refutation paragraph acknowledges the opposing view, and summarizes their main points. Rubric may be poorly integrated esway sentences. Three or argumentative main essay are present but may lack detail and development in one or two. Conclusion summarizes main topics, writint is repetitive. Unclear contains vague termsappears unoriginal, or offers relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the ссылка. Author anticipates and successfully defuses counter-arguments; makes novel connections which illuminate thesis Argument is clear writing usually flows logically and makes sense. Quotations are for well into sentences.

Найдено :